Average superannuation balance by age

The average superannuation balance by age is between $15,600 and $74,100, peaking at 323,700 for people aged 55-64.

According to the most recent Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) data, from the 2013/14 financial year and released late in 2015, these are the average superannuation balances by age:

Average superannuation balance by age (2013/14)

Age RangeAverage Superannuation Balance
15-24$ 15,600
25-34$ 51,100
35-44$ 99,500
45-54$ 180,300
55-64$ 323,700
65-74$ 243,900
74+$ 74,100

Source: ABS 6523.0 Household Income and Wealth, Australia, 2013–14

Average superannuation balance by age - 2013_14

However there is considerable differences in average superannuation balances based on gender, as a different set of ABS statistics shows.

Average superannuation balance by age and gender (2013/14)

Age RangeAverage Super Balance – MaleAverage Super Balance – Female
15-24$ 6,724$ 4,219
25-34$ 30,760$ 25,015
35-44$ 77,949$ 53,660
45-54$ 151,473$ 90,847
55-64$ 321,993$ 180,013
65-69$ 354,564$ 249,183
70+$ 302,309$ 248,619

Source: ABS 4125.0 – Gender Indicators, Australia, Aug 2015

Note that these statistics use slightly different age brackets.Average superannuation balances by age and gender - 2013_14

The ABS statistics also showed that the average superannuation balance across all ages was higher than previously thought, with the average superannuation balance for ‘all households of $159,900 in 2013/14. There are also indications the superannuation gender gap is slowly closing.

Average superannuation balance for SMSFs

According to the most recent ATO SMSF statistics the average balance per Self Managed Superannuation Fund (SMSF) member for the 2013/14 financial year was $564,086.

Want to be kept up-to-date with SMSF and Superannuation changes, why not subscribe to our Newsletter?

This article, as with all content on this site, is for informational purposes only, and is not legal, financial, tax or other advice. Please read our Terms and Conditions of Use.

16 thoughts on “Average superannuation balance by age”

  1. I am a little bit confused by the numbers presented in this as the average super balance by age for the 25-34 age bracket is $51100 however the average breakdown for the same age bracket by gender is $30760 and $25015 for men and women respectively. This means that the average super is effectively doubled when not split by gender?

    1. You raise an interesting point. I don’t know the reason for this at the moment – I will need to look into it.

      If your interested the data comes from table 12.2 in 6523.0 Household Income and Wealth, Australia, 2013-14 and table 25 in 4125.0 Gender Indicators, Australia, Aug 2015.

  2. May I suggest the list of balances has a third column- female, male and couples? May most retirees are couples and their super balance is shared. Women are perhaps not as badly off as shown unless they are single and retired

    1. Geoff, you are exactly and completely correct. As far as Super goes we have three groups to consider and not just two. We have Single Males, Single females and Couples. Super and the Super and the Aged Pension go hand in hand and unless we have that third column then the stats become rather academic having have little purpose in the real world.

      I am tempted to say that the average male at 65 has $355,000 and the average female at 65 has $250,000 meaning that a couple at 65 has $615,000 cash assets in Super … which is highly relevant when you factor in the Aged Pension entitlements. I suspect that my assumption from the above stats is wrong.

  3. Averages bssed on the “mean” are totally skewed by the Rineharts and Packers. Please use “median” figures that are factually representative.

  4. Averages are near meaningless. Totally inflated by the Murdochs and packers. Why don’t you use means ? statistically a better measure.

    1. The above figures are the means. I’m using means/averages instead of the median because that’s what the Australian Bureau of Statistics reports.

      Though median figures are include for some aspects of the reports – I’ll need to incorporate this into an update of the article.

  5. You can use means, medians or whatever you want but consider this: the average for all Australians for 74+ is $74,100 but the average for males is $302,309 and for females $248,619. This is not possible in any configuration. What a farce! It makes the expression that there lies, damned lies and then statistics an absolute truism.

    One would expect that the male average would be above the overall average and the female below it. but both massively over it. You have to be kidding!

  6. Consider the following:
    A person aged 65 years, home owner with assets, excluding the family home, of less than $209K is eligible for the full aged pension. Including pension supplement and energy allowance this is equivalent to $22,804.60pa. The same person would have had to put over $844,614.81 into a SMSF and return a net 2.7% on the fund to generate the same income of $22,804.60. (Of course, I would appreciate someone checking my figures). However, the self-funded retiree is not entitled to the benefits that go with the aged pension card. On a social equity/justice consideration, the question now is what value is there in superannuation and how does this meet the government’s determination to have people funding their twilight years? This question should resonate even louder when you factor in the ABS figures on superannuation balances? If my logic/reasoning is erroneous, I would appreciate your correction

    1. Patricia you are making a basic error that the super balance is meant to be retained till death. A more accurate way of looking at it may be to consider a retiree with a super balance of $800,000. If they have a life expectancy of 16 years they could withdraw $50,000 a year until death, assuming absolutely zero growth on their investment. Super was never intended to be an asset that was passed on to children, it is meant to provide an income during retirement and to be progressively drawn down each year.

      1. LOL Dennis, a couple at 65 with their own home with $800,000 in Super at 5% withdrawal would be paid $50,000/yr while the couple next door, who have never worked and are of the same age living in their inherited home would be able to claim the Aged Pension of $35,000 and with pensioner benefits and the health card their income would effectively be $40,000/yr. I can now see the benefits of saving that $800,000 in Super over one’s working life to get an extra $10,000/yr income over a couple who have a Nil Super Balance. Of course that extra $10,000 has to cover extra costs as the ‘rich couple’ do not get any pensioner discounts. I can now see the retirement benefits of Super cash savings.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *