115,000 people to be affected by TTR pension changes

Nest egg, superannuaiton, SMSF, retirement
Share this article:

Budget 2016, changes to superannuation, Transition to Retirement pensions, TTR, TRIS, 15% taxThe Government estimates that around 115,000 people will be affected by the Transition to Retirement pensions changes proposed in the 2016 Budget.

Superannuation policy is again a focus in the election campaign, this time on the changes to Transition to Retirement pensions (variously shortened to TTR or TRIS).

“The change will affect 115,000 to the transition to retirement income stream. That is based on the Productivity Commission analysis which says just 5% of superannuants aged between 55 and 64 have these schemes,” said Treasurer Scott Morrison.

“We are not abolishing the transition to retirement income stream system, it is important for those who are moving through that process and scaling down their work. The Productivity Commission also found the overwhelming majority of people who are engaged in these schemes are working full-time.”

Update: ASFA estimates that 550,000 people will be affected by the changes to Transition to Retirement pensions in the 2016 Budget.

All three Treasury ministers have been doing the rounds of media interviews trying to fix up the trouble caused by Foreign Minster Julie Bishop’s interview on 3AW.

The 2016 Budget includes a measure to remove the tax concession on super fund income supporting a TTR pension. Currently this income is not taxed, under the Exempt Current Pension Income (ECPI) rules. If enacted as set out in the Budget from 1 July 2017 super funds would pay tax on this income at 15%.

Minister for Small Business and Assistant Treasurer Kelly O’Dwyer told Radio National Breakfast that there are “around about” 115,000 people currently with TTR pensions, about 80,000 of which have SMSFs. How many people are actually affected by the policy – if it is enacted – depends on how many of these existing pensions cease or covert to full account-based pensions and how many new TTR pensions are started.

O’Dwyer said these figures are included in the modelling of who will be affected by the Budget changes.

The Treasurer said in the Budget speech that 96% of Australians with superannuation “will be unaffected by or be better off as a result of the superannuation changes we have announced tonight”.

Finance Minister Mathias Cormann said the Government was standing by the figure of 4% of Australian being worse-off.

“When it comes to the transition to retirement, and we got to remember what this was designed to do. It was designed to help those people who approach with time and who were reducing their working hours to draw an income stream out of their superannuation after they had reach the relevant age but were still continuing to work at least part time,” he told the ABC AM program.

“Increasingly what’s been happening is that people use it to draw a tax free income stream from superannuation, right, continuing to work full-time as well and what we’ve done in the budget, it’s really an integrity measure to align the tax treatment of earnings in the accumulation phase, a pre-actual retirement.”

“Making it 15 per cent across the board, which is what applies to everybody else that continues to contribute and generate earnings in the accumulation phase.”

Members of the Government have repeatedly been asked if the change to TTR pensions will affect people on lower incomes. It should be noted that the Treasurer said the policies would result in 4% of Australians being worse-off, but not that these were the top 4% of income earners. When asked about this Government Ministers tend to refer to the superannuation changes for low income earners and say that superannuation is still concessionally taxed.

Correction: While the Treasurer didn’t say in the Budget speech that the 4% affected by the superannuation changes was the top 4% of income earners the Prime Minister has made such a statement. “Our reforms to superannuation, which affect only the 4 per cent of highest income earners, in any negative way or adverse way, these reforms make our superannuation system fairer and more flexible,” said the PM following the Budget.

“There’s still a highly concessional tax treatment and it’s obviously part of a broader package which is designed to make superannuation tax arrangements fairer and more sustainable,” Cormann said on AM.

When it was put to the Treasurer that some people with Transition to Retirement pensions earn less than $100,000 a year he replied: “Remember what the scheme is for – if someone has a low balance or a low income you would have to ask the question why someone would be advising them to draw down on a low balance superannuation account when that’s the superannuation account they’re going to be relying on in their retirement. And one of the reasons we’re changing this scheme is to ensure that the TRISS measures are only used by those in a position where it is suitable for their circumstances.”

Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young has also been unclear on the Greens superannuation policy, confusing if the policy was to tax super fund income or superannuation contributions at marginal tax rates on 891 ABC Adelaide. The Greens policy is to apply progressive tax rates to superannuation contributions.

Update: The Coalition may yet change its superannuation policy, potentially after the election. Cabinet Secretary Arthur Sinodinos has told Sky News: “If we win the election, there will be consultation on various changes and then legislation presented to the party room.”

Want to be kept up-to-date with SMSF and Superannuation changes, why not subscribe to our Newsletter?

This article, as with all content on this site, is for informational purposes only, and is not legal, financial, tax or other advice. Please read our Terms and Conditions of Use.

Share this article:


  1. “It should be noted that the Treasurer said the policies would result in 4% of Australians being worse-off, but not that these were the top 4% of income earners.”

    What a load of cobblers!!!!!

    We are NOT in the top 4% of earners both being retired 1. We don’t have an income that would allow us to make Pre Tax contribution s into Super and 2 Due to redraw and redeposits into Super we have both exceeded the $500,000 Post Tax caps. We can no longer redeposit $180,000 each back into our Super which has a balance of well under $500,000. And the proposed sale of a modest rental property which we have fully laid off, was going to be our Super nest egg BUTwe can no longer put that Post Tax cash into our Super!!!!!!

    Our reasonable Super expectations ARE a whole lot worse off and we fall well outside this mythical top 4%!!!!

    I know that I am not alone when I say that my wife’s Super was taken to the cleaners in the GFC. We had a long term strategy to try and rebuild our Super balances but it seems that every year the Super rules and Aged Pension rules change!!!

    These particular proposed ‘non retrospective’ changes are the last straw!!!!!

    I have never voted Labor nor Green but I feel betrayed trying to do what my Government has encouraged, be financially independent in retirement.

    My message to Turnbull is very unprintable and he has totally lost my vote.

    Thank you Turnbull … If you get my message!!!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *